Just how dumb is Susan Rogers? SUE, IF WE AREN'T SAFE NOW WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF YOU HAD LAID OFF THE 6 POLICE OFFICERS THAT YOU WANTED TO IN MARCH?
It seems she has been cc'ing or bcc'ing Erik Larsen on all her emails. That would seem to be a code of ethics violation in some cases especially the email asking where Mitch Remig was on the list.
It seems her latest escapade is trying to have the State Police come into town because we are not safe.
SUE, IF WE AREN'T SAFE NOW WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF YOU HAD LAID OFF THE 6 POLICE OFFICERS THAT YOU WANTED TO IN MARCH? WOULDN'T WE HAVE BEEN IN REAL JEOPARDY THEN? YOU DIDN'T SEEM TO CARE THEN.
Would that have been alright because it was YOUR idea back then? Rogers, it seems to me, is truly nuts! Narcissistic and Machiavellian what a combination.
Sue, if you are skeptical about the need for more officers to replace retiring officers why do you want the State Police?
It seems her latest escapade is trying to have the State Police come into town because we are not safe.
SUE, IF WE AREN'T SAFE NOW WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF YOU HAD LAID OFF THE 6 POLICE OFFICERS THAT YOU WANTED TO IN MARCH? WOULDN'T WE HAVE BEEN IN REAL JEOPARDY THEN? YOU DIDN'T SEEM TO CARE THEN.
Would that have been alright because it was YOUR idea back then? Rogers, it seems to me, is truly nuts! Narcissistic and Machiavellian what a combination.
Sue, if you are skeptical about the need for more officers to replace retiring officers why do you want the State Police?
Do you have the email where she wants the State Police to patrol our town?
Reply to this
You think she emailed the State Police? She went to visit the AG, the DCA and civil service on, I believe it was, Tuesday.
I wonder if the AG knows she is (jmho) certifiable?
Reply to this
I heard the police were the reason erik larsen put in the correction article in the app because he was given false information, from I'm sure you can guess who, about the school money that was borrowed. He put the new article in and, wouldn't you guess it, he still didn't correct it. I wonder if its because SR told him not to put the correction in there, cause she wants the cops to look bad. I wonder if he's going to be asked to put another correction article in, with the truth, before the app gets sued for printing false information. I was told that the police, voluntarily, gave a lot back to the town to save jobs last year!!!! It wasn't because of the borrowed money. This just proves that SR will do anything to make anybody else look bad for her bad decisions!!!!
Reply to this
Does anyone have the link to the still in-correct correction article? Please post it on here if possible.
Reply to this
Based on the APP.com article is Susan Rogers the mayor already? This woman is out of control or thinks she's in complete control already.
Reply to this
I think she is also in control of the bloc in the Beach. I wonder which town is next? Maybe the county?
Reply to this
Reply to Don Grohowski:
Is mayor Konkus still the mayor of Point Pleasant? I voted for Konkus for mayor/ council and I can’t believe how he is letting Sue Rogers destroy our town. Shame on you MAYOR!
Reply to this
In the OS Mrs Mayor said we need strong experienced council candidates. I guess she is thinking about replacing MR.
Karen's surly mudslinging innuendos are not quite up to her normal viciousness.
Karen seems to forget about MR's and TD's conflicts.
Reply to this
GOPLover, you're right Konkus is still the mayor and has been the mayor since Bill Schroeder's term as mayor ended. In a recent add in the OS paid for the committee to elect sabosic and faraldi an accusation is made that Schroeder had used school tax deferment that was never paid back to the school fund. Since then Konkus has been mayor and I guess faraldi and sabosic are accusing Konkus and his hand picked majority on council of neglecting to pay the money back to the school fund.
It only makes sense that since Schroeder was no longer the mayor it has been the responsibility of mayor Konkus and company to pay the money back to the school fund. However isn't it true that mayor Konkus's council president and candidate for mayor SR championed the idea to take even more money from the school fund in order to create the illusion of a zero tax increase.
Reply to this
Karen Konkus's recent letter in the Ocean Star makes reference to how everybody was living high on the hog and not worried about their finances so much before Marty was elected. Yet she seemed to trivialize the fact that over the years that Marty has been in office, he and his hand picked majority on council have, led our community to where it is. Now Karen wants us to believe the only ones that can get us out of the mess we're in is the ones who put us here???
Reply to this
Albert Einstein's definition of Insanity:
"Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".
Reply to this
Here's a paragraph from my "Public Administration" text book for the Konkus', Rogers, Sobosik, Firaldi, dePaolo, & Remig:
"Those considering public service careers should understand that managing in the public arena is different from that in a private corporation. It requires a commitment to values such as providing quality services for all and dealing with all people on an equal level. It is very important that people who enter the public service do so with a high standard of ethical behavior and an ability to deal honestly and directly with all people."
Reply to this
Chris,
That book can probably now be found in the "burn,baby,burn" file.
Reply to this
If "Mayor" Rogers wants to short staff the police dept then call her when you need a cop and none are available. She claims to be so civic minded that I’m sure she wouldn’t mind your call anytime. Maybe she could send out her neighborhood watch to take care of that pesky guy climbing into your kid’s window... I have her number right off her reelection web site, (theborotaxpayersfirst.com). By the way she won't need cops when she gets all those surveillance cameras right across the street from her house, only us little people will lose police protection.
Reply to this
"Sue Rogers cares about us"? Our Chief of police comes out publicly and says that he has serious safety concerns due to a lack of manpower and she does nothing? She tries to make it political? Those are pretty strong words coming from the man who is in charge of our police department. She then lies about the cost for any new officers hired. What would be the reason that she would not do whatever the Chief suggests in order to make our community safe? Why have the other members not stepped up? They have said that even with the hiring of the new officers and with promotions the cost for the police department will be less then it was last year. I am confused. Why is everything in Rogersville political?
Reply to this
Why, you ask. Maybe she wants to be on the inside track for everything in the "Forth Reich". She and her puppets seem to think that the hand-picked NW citizen brigade can do the paperwork in the PD to save money. I wonder how much state disability will pay for the "paper cuts" , Brian?
Reply to this